Governance, risk, and compliance
GRC platforms streamlining compliance audits (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA), continuous evidence collection, third-party vendor risk, and policy management.
Key Technical Considerations Before Procuring
Evaluate native API connectors to cloud providers and SaaS tools that automate audit evidence gathering without manual screenshot exports.
Documented Solutions in this Category
Showing 20 published solutions with verified evidence
AuditBoard CrossComply
AuditBoard CrossComply from AuditBoard focuses on compliance controls management and evidence coordination. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context CrossComply addresses coordination of compliance controls and supporting evidence. Review how control owners maintain information, how evidence is reused across supported frameworks and how an auditor receives the records needed to assess a defined control. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? AuditBoard CrossComply focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
AuditBoard RiskOversight
AuditBoard RiskOversight from AuditBoard focuses on enterprise risk management and assessment workflows. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context RiskOversight addresses recording and managing organizational risk. A useful evaluation follows a risk from initial assessment through ownership and follow-up, including how teams communicate changes and how risk information reaches the relevant decision-makers. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? AuditBoard RiskOversight focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Bitsight Security Ratings
Bitsight Security Ratings from BitSight focuses on external security performance assessment and third-party risk monitoring. It is external cyber risk assessment technology used for reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Capabilities - External security assessment: Assesses observable indicators associated with an organization's external security posture. - Third-party risk monitoring: Supports reviewing and monitoring the security risk associated with suppliers or business partners. - Risk scoring: Summarizes assessed signals in the scoring or rating model documented by the provider. - Security findings visibility: Provides supporting observations that help teams understand an assessed risk result. - Portfolio reporting: Shows the risk state of the organizations included in a monitored portfolio. - Remediation collaboration: Helps organize discussion and follow-up around identified third-party security issues. Use and operational context Bitsight Security Ratings is relevant to teams overseeing third-party security risk when the requirement centers on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review assessment scope, asset attribution, evidence behind ratings and the process for discussing findings with a supplier. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Bitsight Security Ratings focuses on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Black Kite
Black Kite from Black Kite focuses on third-party cyber risk assessment and monitoring. It is external cyber risk assessment technology used for reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Capabilities - External security assessment: Assesses observable indicators associated with an organization's external security posture. - Third-party risk monitoring: Supports reviewing and monitoring the security risk associated with suppliers or business partners. - Risk scoring: Summarizes assessed signals in the scoring or rating model documented by the provider. - Security findings visibility: Provides supporting observations that help teams understand an assessed risk result. - Supplier assessment workflows: Coordinates the assessment activities used to review third-party security risk. - Portfolio reporting: Shows the risk state of the organizations included in a monitored portfolio. Use and operational context Black Kite is relevant to teams overseeing third-party security risk when the requirement centers on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review assessment scope, asset attribution, evidence behind ratings and the process for discussing findings with a supplier. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Black Kite focuses on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Drata
Drata from Drata focuses on security compliance evidence collection and control monitoring. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Compliance evidence collection: Organizes the documentation used to demonstrate how controls are being managed. - Control monitoring: Tracks the controls or compliance signals included in the product's documented scope. - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Third-party assessments: Adds supplier or external-party risk review to the documented governance workflow. - Policy and task coordination: Tracks governance policies and the actions assigned to their owners. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context Drata supports the collection and management of security compliance evidence. Evaluate a representative control set from evidence collection through owner review and audit preparation, with clear responsibility for correcting a failed check or maintaining an approved exception. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Drata focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Hyperproof
Hyperproof from Hyperproof focuses on compliance operations and evidence management. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Compliance evidence collection: Organizes the documentation used to demonstrate how controls are being managed. - Control monitoring: Tracks the controls or compliance signals included in the product's documented scope. - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Third-party assessments: Adds supplier or external-party risk review to the documented governance workflow. - Policy and task coordination: Tracks governance policies and the actions assigned to their owners. Use and operational context Hyperproof addresses the operation of a compliance evidence and control-management program. Follow a control from its assigned owner through evidence collection and review, including how the organization tracks gaps and reuses appropriate evidence across its supported obligations. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Hyperproof focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Risk Cloud
Risk Cloud from LogicGate focuses on risk assessment and compliance workflow management. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Compliance evidence collection: Organizes the documentation used to demonstrate how controls are being managed. - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Third-party assessments: Adds supplier or external-party risk review to the documented governance workflow. Use and operational context Risk Cloud is relevant to teams preparing audits or managing security governance when the requirement centers on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Risk Cloud focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
OneTrust Privacy Automation
OneTrust Privacy Automation from OneTrust focuses on privacy operations and compliance workflow management. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Third-party assessments: Adds supplier or external-party risk review to the documented governance workflow. - Policy and task coordination: Tracks governance policies and the actions assigned to their owners. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context OneTrust Privacy Automation is relevant to teams preparing audits or managing security governance when the requirement centers on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? OneTrust Privacy Automation focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
OneTrust Third-Party Management
OneTrust Third-Party Management from OneTrust focuses on third-party risk assessment and governance. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Compliance evidence collection: Organizes the documentation used to demonstrate how controls are being managed. - Control monitoring: Tracks the controls or compliance signals included in the product's documented scope. - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Third-party assessments: Adds supplier or external-party risk review to the documented governance workflow. - Policy and task coordination: Tracks governance policies and the actions assigned to their owners. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context OneTrust Third-Party Management is relevant to teams preparing audits or managing security governance when the requirement centers on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? OneTrust Third-Party Management focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Panorays
Panorays from Panorays focuses on third-party security assessment and supplier risk management. It is external cyber risk assessment technology used for reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Capabilities - External security assessment: Assesses observable indicators associated with an organization's external security posture. - Third-party risk monitoring: Supports reviewing and monitoring the security risk associated with suppliers or business partners. - Risk scoring: Summarizes assessed signals in the scoring or rating model documented by the provider. - Supplier assessment workflows: Coordinates the assessment activities used to review third-party security risk. - Portfolio reporting: Shows the risk state of the organizations included in a monitored portfolio. - Remediation collaboration: Helps organize discussion and follow-up around identified third-party security issues. Use and operational context Panorays is relevant to teams overseeing third-party security risk when the requirement centers on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Deployment: Cloud service / SaaS. Before adoption, review assessment scope, asset attribution, evidence behind ratings and the process for discussing findings with a supplier. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Panorays focuses on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management
ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management from ProcessUnity focuses on supplier risk assessment and governance workflows. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Compliance evidence collection: Organizes the documentation used to demonstrate how controls are being managed. - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Third-party assessments: Adds supplier or external-party risk review to the documented governance workflow. - Policy and task coordination: Tracks governance policies and the actions assigned to their owners. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management is relevant to teams preparing audits or managing security governance when the requirement centers on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Policy Compliance
Policy Compliance from Qualys focuses on configuration compliance assessment and reporting. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Control monitoring: Tracks the controls or compliance signals included in the product's documented scope. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Policy and task coordination: Tracks governance policies and the actions assigned to their owners. Use and operational context Policy Compliance is relevant to teams preparing audits or managing security governance when the requirement centers on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Policy Compliance focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
RiskRecon
RiskRecon from RiskRecon focuses on third-party security assessment and external risk monitoring. It is external cyber risk assessment technology used for reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Capabilities - External security assessment: Assesses observable indicators associated with an organization's external security posture. - Third-party risk monitoring: Supports reviewing and monitoring the security risk associated with suppliers or business partners. - Risk scoring: Summarizes assessed signals in the scoring or rating model documented by the provider. - Supplier assessment workflows: Coordinates the assessment activities used to review third-party security risk. - Remediation collaboration: Helps organize discussion and follow-up around identified third-party security issues. Use and operational context RiskRecon is relevant to teams overseeing third-party security risk when the requirement centers on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review assessment scope, asset attribution, evidence behind ratings and the process for discussing findings with a supplier. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? RiskRecon focuses on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Scrut
Scrut from Scrut Automation focuses on compliance evidence collection and risk management. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Control monitoring: Tracks the controls or compliance signals included in the product's documented scope. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Third-party assessments: Adds supplier or external-party risk review to the documented governance workflow. Use and operational context Scrut is relevant to teams preparing audits or managing security governance when the requirement centers on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Scrut focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Secureframe
Secureframe from Secureframe focuses on compliance evidence management and security control tracking. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Compliance evidence collection: Organizes the documentation used to demonstrate how controls are being managed. - Control monitoring: Tracks the controls or compliance signals included in the product's documented scope. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Third-party assessments: Adds supplier or external-party risk review to the documented governance workflow. - Policy and task coordination: Tracks governance policies and the actions assigned to their owners. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context Secureframe is relevant to teams preparing audits or managing security governance when the requirement centers on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Secureframe focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
SecurityScorecard Ratings
SecurityScorecard Ratings from SecurityScorecard focuses on external security posture ratings and third-party risk monitoring. It is external cyber risk assessment technology used for reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Capabilities - External security assessment: Assesses observable indicators associated with an organization's external security posture. - Third-party risk monitoring: Supports reviewing and monitoring the security risk associated with suppliers or business partners. - Risk scoring: Summarizes assessed signals in the scoring or rating model documented by the provider. - Security findings visibility: Provides supporting observations that help teams understand an assessed risk result. - Supplier assessment workflows: Coordinates the assessment activities used to review third-party security risk. - Portfolio reporting: Shows the risk state of the organizations included in a monitored portfolio. - Remediation collaboration: Helps organize discussion and follow-up around identified third-party security issues. Use and operational context SecurityScorecard's ratings entry supports assessment of observable security signals for organizations. Review the assets and evidence behind a result, its relevance to the business relationship and the process for discussing a disputed or remediated finding with the assessed party. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review assessment scope, asset attribution, evidence behind ratings and the process for discussing findings with a supplier. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? SecurityScorecard Ratings focuses on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Sprinto
Sprinto from Sprinto focuses on security compliance monitoring and evidence workflows. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Control monitoring: Tracks the controls or compliance signals included in the product's documented scope. - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Third-party assessments: Adds supplier or external-party risk review to the documented governance workflow. - Policy and task coordination: Tracks governance policies and the actions assigned to their owners. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context Sprinto is relevant to teams preparing audits or managing security governance when the requirement centers on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Deployment: Cloud service / SaaS. Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Sprinto focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
UpGuard Breach Risk
UpGuard Breach Risk from UpGuard focuses on external exposure monitoring and security posture assessment. It is external cyber risk assessment technology used for reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Capabilities - External security assessment: Assesses observable indicators associated with an organization's external security posture. - Third-party risk monitoring: Supports reviewing and monitoring the security risk associated with suppliers or business partners. - Risk scoring: Summarizes assessed signals in the scoring or rating model documented by the provider. - Security findings visibility: Provides supporting observations that help teams understand an assessed risk result. - Supplier assessment workflows: Coordinates the assessment activities used to review third-party security risk. - Portfolio reporting: Shows the risk state of the organizations included in a monitored portfolio. - Remediation collaboration: Helps organize discussion and follow-up around identified third-party security issues. Use and operational context Breach Risk addresses assessment of the organization's own externally visible security exposure. Review discovered assets, the supporting observations and the assignment of remediation work, with verification that a corrected issue changes the assessed exposure as expected. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review assessment scope, asset attribution, evidence behind ratings and the process for discussing findings with a supplier. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? UpGuard Breach Risk focuses on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
UpGuard Vendor Risk
UpGuard Vendor Risk from UpGuard focuses on third-party cyber risk assessment. It is external cyber risk assessment technology used for reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. Capabilities - External security assessment: Assesses observable indicators associated with an organization's external security posture. - Third-party risk monitoring: Supports reviewing and monitoring the security risk associated with suppliers or business partners. - Risk scoring: Summarizes assessed signals in the scoring or rating model documented by the provider. - Security findings visibility: Provides supporting observations that help teams understand an assessed risk result. - Supplier assessment workflows: Coordinates the assessment activities used to review third-party security risk. - Portfolio reporting: Shows the risk state of the organizations included in a monitored portfolio. - Remediation collaboration: Helps organize discussion and follow-up around identified third-party security issues. Use and operational context Vendor Risk addresses assessment and monitoring of suppliers or other external organizations. Review portfolio scope, assessment evidence and supplier communications, including how the organization records a decision about a vendor's security posture and follows up on identified issues. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review assessment scope, asset attribution, evidence behind ratings and the process for discussing findings with a supplier. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? UpGuard Vendor Risk focuses on reviewing security risk associated with organizations and suppliers. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.
Vanta
Vanta from Vanta focuses on compliance evidence automation and security control monitoring. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Compliance evidence collection: Organizes the documentation used to demonstrate how controls are being managed. - Control monitoring: Tracks the controls or compliance signals included in the product's documented scope. - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Third-party assessments: Adds supplier or external-party risk review to the documented governance workflow. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context Vanta is relevant to teams preparing audits or managing security governance when the requirement centers on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Vanta focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.