Verified Solutions Directory

Documented Products & Services

Search and filter enterprise cybersecurity solutions by category, deployment architecture, supported operating systems, and verified pricing models. Default sorting is alphabetical. Position does not imply editorial ranking or performance superiority.

Showing 9 of 544 published solutions
Managed Service

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is a managed security service offered by Arctic Wolf. Its documented scope centers on managed security monitoring and incident response. Capabilities - Managed threat monitoring: Adds a service team to the monitoring and assessment of supported security signals. - Human-led investigation: Provides analyst involvement in reviewing activity and deciding how a threat should be handled. - Response and containment support: Assists with the response steps included in the service agreement and technical deployment. - Security tool integration: Uses supported security tools or telemetry as part of the managed detection workflow. - Incident communication: Provides a channel for communicating findings and the actions required from the customer. Use and operational context Arctic Wolf's MDR service adds an external security operations relationship to the customer's monitoring environment. Review the division of responsibilities between internal staff and the service team, including the context supplied with a finding and the escalation process. Deployment and evaluation Deployment: Managed service with provider-led monitoring and response within the agreed service scope. Before adoption, review supported data sources, response authority, escalation responsibilities and the actions included in the service agreement. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response focuses on adding expert monitoring and response to supported telemetry. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative service deliverables, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.

Deployment: Managed service with provider-led monitoring and response within the agreed service scope
Pricing: Pricing not publicly documented
Managed Service

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is a managed security service offered by Arctic Wolf. Its documented scope centers on managed vulnerability assessment and risk prioritization. Capabilities - Vulnerability scanning: Finds potential weaknesses that can be reviewed and prioritized for remediation. - Risk-based prioritization: Uses the available risk context to help order remediation work. - Configuration assessment: Identifies configuration issues as a separate source of security exposure. - Cloud exposure assessment: Brings the connected cloud environments into the documented exposure assessment scope. Use and operational context Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is relevant to teams planning vulnerability remediation across assets when the requirement centers on identifying and prioritizing security weaknesses. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Deployment: Managed service with provider-led monitoring and response within the agreed service scope. Before adoption, review scan scope, credentialed assessment options, prioritization inputs and how remediation owners verify closure. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Arctic Wolf Managed Risk focuses on identifying and prioritizing security weaknesses. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative service deliverables, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.

Deployment: Managed service with provider-led monitoring and response within the agreed service scope
Pricing: Pricing not publicly documented
Software Product

Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness

Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness from Arctic Wolf focuses on employee security training and phishing simulations. It is security awareness technology or service used for improving how employees recognize and handle security risks. Capabilities - Phishing simulations: Creates controlled exercises to assess how users handle realistic phishing scenarios. - Security training content: Provides learning material intended to improve security knowledge and decision-making. - User risk insights: Helps teams understand which user behaviors or exposures deserve additional attention. - Program reporting: Provides information for monitoring participation, outcomes and the progress of the awareness program. - Employee threat reporting: Makes it easier for employees to escalate suspected phishing messages to the security team. Use and operational context Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness is relevant to organizations running employee awareness programs when the requirement centers on improving how employees recognize and handle security risks. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review training relevance, simulation design, reporting methods and the treatment of employee information. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness focuses on improving how employees recognize and handle security risks. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.

Pricing: Pricing not publicly documented
Software Product

Arkose Bot Manager

Arkose Bot Manager from Arkose Labs focuses on automated abuse prevention and challenge orchestration. It is automated traffic protection technology used for distinguishing and controlling abusive automated requests. Capabilities - Automated traffic detection: Identifies automated requests within the traffic processed by the service. - Challenge and verification workflows: Applies the verification mechanisms documented for suspicious traffic or users. - Account abuse protection: Addresses the automated account attacks included in the vendor's protection scope. - Scraping abuse controls: Applies the documented controls for automated extraction or scraping activity. - Application integration: Provides the supported mechanisms for bringing bot controls into application traffic flows. Use and operational context Arkose Bot Manager addresses automated abuse through the bot assessment and challenge mechanisms documented by Arkose Labs. Evaluate an actual account or application abuse scenario, including how a legitimate user proceeds when additional verification is required. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review integration paths, treatment of legitimate automation, challenge behavior and the effect on real users. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Arkose Bot Manager focuses on distinguishing and controlling abusive automated requests. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.

Pricing: Pricing not publicly documented
Software Product

Armis Centrix

Armis Centrix from Armis focuses on connected asset visibility and exposure management. It is security asset visibility technology used for establishing an inventory and identifying security coverage gaps. Capabilities - Asset inventory consolidation: Creates a more coherent view of the assets included in the security management scope. - Agentless asset discovery: Uses the discovery approach documented by the vendor without requiring its own agent on every asset. - Security coverage assessment: Helps identify differences between known assets and the protections recorded for them. - Exposure visibility: Brings asset-level exposure into the security review workflow. - Data source integrations: Collects asset context from the supported connected systems. - Device identification: Uses the documented identification signals to classify observed devices. Use and operational context Armis Centrix is relevant to teams reconciling assets across networking and security systems when the requirement centers on establishing an inventory and identifying security coverage gaps. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Deployment: Cloud service / SaaS. Before adoption, review discovery scope, device identification, integration permissions and how conflicting asset records are handled. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? Armis Centrix focuses on establishing an inventory and identifying security coverage gaps. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.

Deployment: Cloud service / SaaS
Pricing: Pricing not publicly documented
Software Product

AttackIQ Flex

AttackIQ Flex from AttackIQ focuses on security control testing and attack simulation. It is security control validation technology used for exercising attack scenarios against defensive controls. Capabilities - Security control validation: Checks whether selected defensive controls detect or handle the tested attack behavior. - Attack scenario simulation: Exercises the attack scenarios supported by the product in an authorized environment. - ATT&CK-aligned testing: Relates the documented testing content to adversary techniques in the ATT&CK framework. - Detection coverage assessment: Helps security teams understand which tested behaviors are visible to their deployed controls. - Remediation prioritization: Connects validation results with the improvement actions supported by the workflow. - Repeatable security testing: Supports revisiting selected tests as the environment or defenses change. Use and operational context Flex is relevant to teams running defined security-control tests. Select a representative attack scenario, agree the authorized test scope and examine which defensive signals are produced, so the assessment can lead to a specific detection or configuration improvement. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review approved test scope, scenario relevance, telemetry availability and the process for validating improvements after changes. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? AttackIQ Flex focuses on exercising attack scenarios against defensive controls. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.

Pricing: Pricing not publicly documented
Software Product

AttackIQ Ready

AttackIQ Ready from AttackIQ focuses on continuous security control validation. It is security control validation technology used for exercising attack scenarios against defensive controls. Capabilities - Security control validation: Checks whether selected defensive controls detect or handle the tested attack behavior. - Attack scenario simulation: Exercises the attack scenarios supported by the product in an authorized environment. - Detection coverage assessment: Helps security teams understand which tested behaviors are visible to their deployed controls. - Remediation prioritization: Connects validation results with the improvement actions supported by the workflow. - Repeatable security testing: Supports revisiting selected tests as the environment or defenses change. Use and operational context AttackIQ Ready is relevant to security teams evaluating detection and prevention coverage when the requirement centers on exercising attack scenarios against defensive controls. Scope the evaluation around the functions listed above and the assets or workflows that need coverage. A useful trial should use representative business conditions so the team can assess the quality of the results and the effort needed to act on them. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review approved test scope, scenario relevance, telemetry availability and the process for validating improvements after changes. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? AttackIQ Ready focuses on exercising attack scenarios against defensive controls. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.

Pricing: Pricing not publicly documented
Software Product

AuditBoard CrossComply

AuditBoard CrossComply from AuditBoard focuses on compliance controls management and evidence coordination. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context CrossComply addresses coordination of compliance controls and supporting evidence. Review how control owners maintain information, how evidence is reused across supported frameworks and how an auditor receives the records needed to assess a defined control. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? AuditBoard CrossComply focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.

Pricing: Pricing not publicly documented
Software Product

AuditBoard RiskOversight

AuditBoard RiskOversight from AuditBoard focuses on enterprise risk management and assessment workflows. It is security governance and compliance technology used for coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. Capabilities - Risk assessment workflows: Structures how risks are recorded, evaluated and assigned for follow-up. - Audit preparation: Helps coordinate the information and activities required to prepare for an audit. - Framework mapping: Maps controls or evidence to the frameworks supported by the product, without itself constituting certification. - Trust communication: Provides a documented way to share security or compliance information with interested parties. Use and operational context RiskOversight addresses recording and managing organizational risk. A useful evaluation follows a risk from initial assessment through ownership and follow-up, including how teams communicate changes and how risk information reaches the relevant decision-makers. Deployment and evaluation Before adoption, review supported frameworks, evidence ownership, assessment workflows and how the system fits existing governance responsibilities. Assign an owner for administration, document required permissions and identify how the product or service will fit the existing operating process. Buyer questions - What is the main purpose? AuditBoard RiskOversight focuses on coordinating controls, evidence and risk decisions. - What should a proof of concept establish? Test the listed capabilities against representative assets and workflows, record useful results and unresolved gaps, and confirm who handles follow-up work. - What should be confirmed before purchase? Ask the vendor which edition or service scope includes the required features, which dependencies must be configured and what licensing or contract terms apply. Pricing has not been verified for this catalog.

Pricing: Pricing not publicly documented
Page 5 of 61