Evidence-Backed Side-by-Side Comparison
Okta Workforce Identity Cloud vs. Microsoft Entra ID
Comparing documented technical capabilities, SLA commitments, and verified pricing models without synthetic scores.
Comparing 2 solutions side-by-side
| Evaluation Criteria | MI Microsoft Microsoft Entra ID | |
|---|---|---|
| Classification & Vendor | ||
Offering Type | Software Product | Software Product |
Vendor Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Redmond, WA |
Corporate Identity Status | Unverified Profile | Unverified Profile |
Primary Security Specialization | Identity and access management | Identity and access management |
| Architecture & Deployment | ||
Deployment Models | 100% Cloud SaaS with active-active 99.99% availability SLA and local Lightweight AD Agents | Cloud service / SaaS |
Supported Platforms / OS | Cross-platform cloud web application; Okta Verify supported on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Not documented in our sources |
| Pricing & Commercial Model | ||
Pricing Transparency Status | Publicly Documented | Pricing Not Publicly Documented |
Entry List Pricing | $24.00 (per-user-per-year) | Custom quote required / Not publicly listed |
Commercial Licensing Scope | Modular per-user pricing: Single Sign-On starts at $2/user/month; Adaptive MFA starts at $3/user/month billed annually. | Contact vendor or channel partner for pricing. |
| Authentication & Access | ||
Supported MFA Methods & FIDO2/Passkeys Range of authentication factors supported including phishing-resistant FIDO2/WebAuthn. | Okta FastPass (FIDO2), WebAuthn, SMS, Voice, Push, YubiKey | FIDO2 / Passkeys, Microsoft Authenticator, OATH tokens, SMS |
Continuous Adaptive Trust & Risk Signals Dynamic step-up authentication based on device health, IP reputation, and behavioral anomalies. | Supported | Supported |
| Identity Lifecycle | ||
Directory & HRIS Integrations Native synchronization with Active Directory, Entra ID, Workday, and SCIM endpoints. | Active Directory, LDAP, Workday, BambooHR, SCIM 2.0 | Active Directory (Entra Connect), Workday, SAP, SCIM |
| Privilege Governance | ||
Privileged Session Recording & Auditing Keystroke and video recording of privileged administrative sessions (SSH, RDP). | Not supported | Not supported |
Data Provenance Notice: “Not documented in our sources” indicates the absence of publicly verifiable vendor technical documentation. SecurifyA never synthesizes unverified capabilities or assumes capabilities without documentation.
Comparison FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions: Cybersecurity Comparisons
Learn how SecurifyA verifies capability claims, sources comparison data, and structures objective evaluation criteria.
|
Our comparison matrix aligns solutions across standardized technical dimensions: agent architectures (kernel vs. eBPF vs. agentless), telemetry retention, automated containment mechanisms, operating system compatibility, and verified pricing models. We present documented facts rather than subjective star ratings.
Have an architecture or vendor question not answered here?Our analysts review vendor source documentation and publish updates continuously.